Information times dispatch (reporter Yan Xiaoguang) in the forged court "executive announcement", the trade and Industry Bureau of the "business license" and other documents, two only primary school culture liar, even publicly selling Guangzhou city Haizhuqu District a 21000 square meters of land, in an attempt to defraud the 65000000 element.Finally, a gain 1900000 were captured after being cheated, but the investment company, has been bamboozled to Guangzhou Guotufangguan Bureau (hereinafter referred to as the Housing Authority) and the Bureau of finance to pay a 14720000 yuan "leasing" and "tax", was found after being conned asked the relevant departments to return these unjust enrichment money is rejected, the final because of a court hearing, the case was held a few days ago. fake intermediary low "sell" the failure to reportedly, the land mass is the Guangdong Overseas Investment Corporation from the Housing Authority purchased, but because the company and the development of the land "southern company subsidiaries" have encountered debt crisis, has led in the Housing Authority land leasing to more than 1400 without pay.Cause this was impossible under the land certificate, became a "failure". Chen Ruyin and Chen Yaoxiong heard the "failure" of the specific situation, decided to fake call themselves is the land "land intermediary", and released to wind, claimed to be "cheap sale", in an attempt to defraud the 65000000, the final two to get to Guangzhou grand new investment company limited. mistakenly make huge transfer payments cannot return kick two "unjust enrichment" fooled a macro new company’s trust, macro new company has paid to bureau of Finance 42 yuan of taxes and housing authority from 1429 yuan of land leasing, then a cheater. due to the housing bureau and Finance Bureau refused to refund to pay huge fees.Helpless, macro new company "unjust enrichment" for, the housing bureau and Finance Bureau on the court.The Guangzhou City Intermediate People’s court verdict that, although "macro new company" is false, but "unjust enrichment" landlord "south" and "foreign company", by the two company to pay back the money.But in fact the two companies in debt, do not have the money to.Therefore, "macro new company" that a trial of improper, appeal to the Guangdong Province high court, ask the housing bureau and Finance Bureau returned by swindlers Huyou instead of money. recently, province high court case to hold a hearing, the housing bureau and Finance Bureau were sent to court. each view Housing Authority: "may also be considered a refund, but need to bureau of Finance approval" Housing Bureau said, "about 14000000 of the land leasing, can also be considered a refund, the court of first instance judgment macro new company by fraud false pay, but because the final refunds Need Finance Bureau for examination and approval, the Housing Authority alone cannot perform refund procedures, so directly from the land sector account refund is not possible." Finance Bureau: "if the refund will result in the loss of state-owned assets" finance bureau thinks, "at the time of payment documents did not write macros the name of the new company, storage of funds belonging to the treasury funds, if the corresponding taxes, land leasing back to irrelevant third people, will cause the loss of state assets.A trial that land bureau and Finance Bureau in the case of improper benefit relations are not the beneficiary, we are in accordance with the trial court judgment for execution." plaintiff: "is that wrong delivery, why not active correction" plaintiff agent is known, the first-instance judgment although cognizance is southern company and Overseas Corporation of unjust enrichment, but in fact, the beneficiary should be the city Housing Authority and the City Finance Bureau, because the southern company, Overseas Corporation’s financial books or to pay the tax, they didn’t know about it.