The following is a translation of the provided Danish text into English:
"Al-Qaeda slurs Ahmadinejad as things become more absurd in the trash can of history by Tony Karon | @ tonykaron | September 30, 2011 | + tweet Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad treated the United Nations General Assembly like reflections in a mirror, showing an empty chamber with many vacant seats after delegates walked out during Ahmadinejad's speech at the UN headquarters in New York on September 22, 2011. (Photo: Eric Thayer / Reuters) USA and other Western diplomats collectively gathered their papers and walked out of the UN General Assembly chamber when Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad repeated his claim that the 9/11 terror attack was organized by the USA itself. But if the diplomats were irritated, the remnants of Al-Qaeda - at least the Yemen chapter, which produces a bizarre regular glossy magazine written in English and distributed like flyers, including one of its titles, Inspire - were jubilant. 'Why should Iran subscribe to such a ridiculous belief, standing against all logic and evidence?' wrote commentator Abu Suhail in the September edition. The answer, he suggests, is sectarian and cynical - Iran does not wish to be outdone in its stance against leading them up to America. Asics Women, and Shiite Muslims do not wish to give Sunni jihadists any credit. 'If Iran were truly in its aversion to the USA, it would be glad to see another entity strike a blow against the Great Satan, but that is not the case. For Iran, anti-Americanism is just a political game. It is anti-American when it suits, and it works with the USA when it suits, as we have seen in the shameful assistance Iran gave to the USA in its invasion of Afghanistan and in the Shi'a of Iraq, supported by Iran, to bring American forces into the country and welcome them with open arms.' Al-Qaeda threatened to discredit Iran's stance of speaking on behalf of oppressed Muslims, he highlighted, which is why Iran attempts to undermine Al-Qaeda’s 9/11 claim with conspiracy theories. Hey, just because it's in a glossy magazine doesn't mean it makes sense: first off, the point about Iran's 'shameful' assistance to the American invasion of Afghanistan underscores that Tehran did not actually subscribe to Ahmadinejad's conspiratorial ramblings about 9/11, nor does it now. Ahmadinejad is not speaking for Iran, and he is largely speaking only to himself these days, screaming about the Holocaust, 9/11, etc., simply to press buttons in Western media in a desperate attempt to garner attention, having been largely sidelined domestically. Perhaps even more importantly, Suhail misses the point that investigations continue to find that an overwhelming majority of public opinion in the Muslim world shares the belief that the 9/11 attacks were not the work of Arabs. Why might this be, when Al-Qaeda is jumping up and down insisting it was responsible? My own suspicion is that this denial reflects a general distaste for targeting innocent civilians, which violates Islamic rules of warfare. Even if they agree with Al-Qaeda's perception of the West as an aggressive, hostile power against the Muslim world, they are not willing to support, let alone celebrate, violence against innocents in the name of 'retribution'. Al-Qaeda's real problem is not the nutcase rulers like Ahmadinejad; it is the fact that it has been rejected by a majority of Muslim public opinion, even those sectors that have stood up against US-backed regimes in the Middle East. And that is a reality that will not be altered by any amount of glossy packaging of Al-Qaeda's discredited ideas."
This translation aims to maintain the original meaning and tone while ensuring clarity and grammatical correctness in English.