Letdig.com - Together, let's dig up China's emerging websites and new锐 webmasters. (Note: "新锐" can be translated as "emerging" or "sharp," but in this context, "emerging" fits better. If you prefer a different tone, it could also be rendered as "pioneering" or "innovative.") A more polished translation might be: "Letdig.com - Together, uncovering China's latest innovative websites and forward-thinking webmasters."

by yinyin on 2007-05-18 18:22:28

Digg is a hotspot, but of course, it's only abroad that it has this status. In China, the more well-known Digg-like site is cnbeta. Of course, some comprehensive Web 2.0 large sites also have partial Digg features. Overall, China is still in the early stages.

A few days ago, a famous webmaster and old acquaintance sent me a small Digg site he was playing with—letdig.com. Although I'm not particularly talented, I feel that it should mean "Let's digg together." The concept is great, and with this webmaster's reputation, if the program can be scaled up and production expanded, the prospects are limitless.

Digg is a form of manual aggregation, an artificial recommendation mechanism. This mechanism is more precise and timely than search engines, and more convenient and comprehensive than news portals. Most importantly, you're not the content producer; the diversity of content sources and user groups will promote Digg to take a specialized path. Letdig is an attempt at aggregating webmaster-related resources.

Currently, letdig is just a beta version, so the program used is quite simple. I think the webmaster's purpose might be to first get users familiar with the Digg model, then expand the platform for a broader aggregation. This idea is good because among our internet users, very few know about Digg. A simple program is easy to use, which is also a good choice and strategy.

I still want to give this famous webmaster a bit of advice: After the testing period, I suggest not to do webmaster-related aggregation because Chinaz and Admin5 are basically already in the aggregation mode. The only difference is the program. So choosing a more attractive direction is worth considering. Additionally, I propose forming a joint fleet where everyone's Digg site has a different focus. We all work together, so there isn't much competition between us, and we can help each other.

The future of Digg is very bright. Human collaboration is something machines can't replace. Establishing a good Digg environment will bring a flood of Digg enthusiasm.