Without web1.0, how could web2.0 come into being?
In the past two years, all major websites have started to notice the trends of web2.0 and are putting a lot of effort into its development. Although the spring breeze of web2.0 has only blown halfway, many websites relying on this concept have already emerged first, attracting the attention of domestic first-line portals such as Sina, 163, and Sohu, which have also started to study web2.0.
Sina always knows things late. In most cases, it hopes to see that a market can indeed bring traffic before it really invests money in it, which is different from many small companies. However, once they launch, they will make some competitors feel a little scared. But I think Sina is not scary. Their blog is the first in the country, but the search accuracy is too poor, and the content of the blog is too vulgar. Although the traffic is large, it does not necessarily bring good results. No one would say that if I want to see pornographic pictures, I will go to Sina Blog, hehe. This joke is a bit big, but I think Sina's culture is leading people into some misunderstandings. In the use of web2.0, externally, Sina Blog can only be considered a forced-reading web2.0. This sounds a little wrong. What is a forced-reading web2.0? To put it simply, most of the traffic from large blogs comes from Sina editors pushing them to the front page of Sina or the blog homepage. If you write an article yourself, it won't bring much traffic! It can be said that except for the vulgar culture I see, I can't see anything I want to see on Sina Blog unless you really need vulgar culture for enlightenment.
Speaking of Sina, we must talk about their recently modified homepage. There has been some progress in the structure of the page, which is moving towards web2.0, but the layout of the page has not changed much. The colors and overall design still seem very crowded. The page is too long, so I basically have no interest in looking at the content below. Besides news, what else can I see on the webpage? Except for advertisements, there is nothing else. Of course, we can forgive Sina for doing this because advertising is the main source of income for Internet portals! But it seems that there is still a lack of humanized content. Once upon a time, many people praised her original homepage design as excellent among Chinese portals, but now compared with QQ and 163, Sina does not have an advantage in technology and content!
When talking about portals, we must mention 163, which is the guide of portal technology, or we can say, it can show how portals should apply web2.0. Hehe, this may sound exaggerated, but friends who have used NetEase email should not find it difficult to feel that their design in technology and presentation is very humanized. Every time NetEase email is updated, it brings some new technologies in the Internet, and fully considers the usage habits of Chinese people in terms of usability. At least I find it very handy to use its email, of course, there are still quite a few problems. Sometimes maybe people need to dig deeper, but I am lazy and don't have the energy to dig, so please let 163 make it simpler~ Hehe
On the homepage of NetEase, we can basically see that the entire site is built using div. Among portal websites, it should be the first in the industry to adopt this technology. Everyone knows that NetEase is technology-oriented, and every time their pages are reformed, they hope to update in technology. But sometimes they overestimate the intelligence of users. The Internet is for ordinary people, not for technical experts, so they violate the user principle and become more tortuous on the road of web2.0~ At least when I go to the NetEase homepage, except for logging in, there is almost nothing worth seeing~
I rarely look at Sohu. Maybe I didn't like it from the beginning, but sometimes I can link to some Sohu blogs from the search. It seems that they have used some new ideas such as Ajax RSS in technology, but I always feel scattered and unstable. However, with the relationship between Sohu and the Olympics, I believe that the year 2008 will bring Sohu a lot of benefits. But besides the benefits, I do not expect it to bring users much practicality of web2.0~
The above talks a lot about the web2.0 of these portals, meaning that whether it is a web1.0 website or a web2.0 website, they now coexist. There may be a lot of fusion between them. Web2.0 websites may need the content of web1.0 websites, while web1.0 websites need the user-friendliness of web2.0. In my view, there is actually a kind of mutual utilization relationship between them. I think that without the vigorous development of web1.0, the massive expansion of content, it would not be possible to promote the rise of web2.0~
Content is the root of a website. Without content, no website can achieve anything. Even Baidu, its content is based on the massive information on the Internet to build up. Can you say whether it is web2.0 or web1.0? Even if you give it an evaluation, Baidu will not care and continue to do its own business!
Speaking of search, many video search websites have also become popular recently. A relatively popular Souxou video search is a website that specializes in searching flv videos. It adopts a lot of web2.0 thoughts in its design, but collects content from most mainstream video websites. The content is mainly obtained by users themselves through searches, and there are related and recommended content. These details all adopt popular web2.0 thoughts, and of course there is ajax technology~. Let me mention Coolux briefly, which is famous for train ticket search and now occupies a lot of vertical search fields!
Talking about so much, I will summarize at last. Although now is the era of web2.0, it cannot exist as a leapfrog concept. It can only be a topic of thought for people to explore the web. More topics will appear in the future development of technology, and will inevitablyé¢ è¦†people's vision, hearing and feeling, but web1.0 will surely exist for a long time. Only in this way can web2.0, web3.0... appear
