Leizhi City Court examiner Liang Feishui said that in the case examination process, inconsistent determination of charges by the Public Security Bureau and the Procuratorate does exist, but the final conviction will still be based on the court's verdict. According to the victim's mother Lin Huijuan's introduction, from the filing of the case to its conclusion, the Municipal Public Security Bureau identified this case as a rape case. After the Procuratorate re-identified the charge, they did not inform the family, nor did they conduct a new investigation. Lin Huijuan believed that the Procuratorate's prosecution of Dai Che for child molestation instead of raping a minor girl had the suspicion of reducing the punishment for the criminal suspect. At around 10 o'clock that day, the trial was over, but the court did not announce the verdict. When the case was being heard, the victim's family hung banners outside the court saying "Strongly demanding that the Leizhi People's Congress supervise the Dai Che rape case" and "Strongly demanding that the Leizhi Procuratorate prosecute Dai Che for rape," expressing dissatisfaction with the Procuratorate's decision to prosecute Dai Che for child molestation. The eye-catching banners drew quite a few passers-by to inquire. Today (August 8) morning, the much-anticipated case of a primary school math teacher and Leizhi city CPPCC member Dai Che suspected of raping a 12-year-old female student at his home went to trial at the Leizhi City People's Court. The Leizhi Procuratorate prosecuted Dai Che for child molestation; the case was not publicly tried.