"Nucleare new math" seems to be a phrase that might contain a typographical error or some creative wording. Assuming you meant "Nuclear New Math," the translation would remain largely the same in English, but let me clarify: - If you're referring to a concept like "nuclear new math," it could mean a new mathematical approach or framework related to nuclear science, energy, or technology. - If "nucleare" was intended as a different word or concept, please provide more context. If this is a specific term or title, it may already be in an anglicized form. Could you confirm if any adjustments are needed?

by gleiseo3 on 2012-02-29 11:01:06

Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear New Math by Mark Thompson | @markthompson_dc | February 17, 2012 | + Tweet Reports that the Pentagon is evaluating a series of cuts to the nation's nuclear arsenal—perhaps going as low as 300 deployed strategic weapons, down from the current 1,550—has triggered concern on Capitol Hill. "I must suggest to you," Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., told Defense Secretary Leon Panetta on Wednesday, "that I think it's reckless folly." But Stephen I. Schwartz, director of the Nonproliferation Review at the Monterey Institute of International Studies in California, went to the history books. "Amid all the hyperbole from congressional Republicans about the Obama administration's ongoing review of nuclear force levels and posture, it is worth remembering that when it comes to actual reductions in U.S. nuclear weapons, both bilateral or unilateral, they have always been deeper and faster under Republicans than under Democrats," Battleland says, citing recently declassified charts to make his case. "During George H.W. Bush's four-year term, the total stockpile was reduced by 38%, from 22,217 to 13,708 weapons, thanks in part to his decision to unilaterally withdraw all land-based nuclear weapons from Europe and South Korea and remove all nuclear weapons from surface warships," Schwartz says. "George W. Bush also went far, reducing the total stockpile over eight years by 50%, from 10,526 to 5,273 weapons." "I don't recall too many Republicans complaining, or objecting to, such reductions," he adds. The stockpile contraction under W., he notes, "occurred during a period when they were fighting two wars, when North Korea conducted two nuclear tests, and as Iran expanded its uranium centrifuge operations."