Are Blade Servers Suitable for SMEs? When it comes to server procurement for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), many people may first consider tower servers and rack servers, at least from an intuitive cost perspective. However, what many don't realize is that blade servers can also be a suitable choice for SMEs in certain situations, especially since server manufacturers like IBM, Dell, and HP have all launched blade server products specifically tailored for SMEs.
Blades: More Than Just Servers
IT staff likely know that installing new servers in a data center requires connecting many peripherals: mouse, keyboard, monitor, power cables, network cables, and even storage. If the number of servers is large, there will be a tangled web of wires. Is there no way to simplify these connections? The answer is blade servers.
We know that blade servers consist of a blade chassis (which can accommodate 2 to 14 blades), blade units, and shared management units, network, and storage connections for all blades. Each blade is equivalent to an independent 1U rack server, which can be configured with 1 to 4 CPUs (providing 2 to 48 cores) and supports up to 256GB of RAM. It has 1-2 hard drive slots or an entire blade server system can share a storage system equipped with 6 or more hard drives. With these "features," the entire blade server system only needs one keyboard, mouse, and video connection (or independent management connection), two power connections for redundancy, and one network connection. Additionally, many blade chassis provide fiber channel or InfiniBand connections for each blade.
Reasons to Choose Blades
There is an industry view that blade servers are more suitable for large enterprises and not for SMEs, but this isn't necessarily true. For any system using three or more servers, blade servers could be a good choice. First, blade servers greatly simplify cable configurations and make management easier. Using blade servers allows you to manage all blades through one interface rather than seven or more independent interfaces. Second, blade servers offer higher density, allowing more devices to be compressed into spaces where tower or rack servers cannot fit, thus saving more space. Moreover, blade servers are more reliable than single servers, offering options such as redundant power supplies and high-availability components.
Perhaps compared to equally scaled rack or tower servers, blade servers are not cheap and may even be more expensive. However, if the system is fully utilized, blade servers can save money over their lifecycle. Blades are more scalable; you can purchase a system with fewer blades according to your company's needs, and as business grows, you can expand by purchasing more blades.
From this, we can see that whether a blade server system is suitable for a company depends less on the type or size of the enterprise itself and more on the IT needs of the company. If the company purchases only one or two servers per year, choosing blade servers might be a bit extravagant. However, if you need to buy 4 to 12 or more rack servers to form a cluster, switching to blade servers would be worthwhile. Especially in companies with multiple data center administrators, blade servers simplify management systems, and businesses can significantly reduce human resource management costs.
Issues to Consider When Choosing Blades
Although we've discussed many reasons to choose blades, compared to rack or tower servers, blade servers do present some issues.
Firstly, external scalability. For 1U rack servers, there are usually two to three PCI-X or PCI-E slots, while blade servers may have none. This is because some blade server systems provide high-performance fiber channel connections or 10 Gigabit Ethernet connections for each blade or shared high-performance storage. Therefore, if you need to connect special hardware externally, a blade system may not be your best choice.
Secondly, power and cooling requirements. The high density of blade systems means they have higher cooling and heat dissipation requirements, naturally requiring more power. For example, some blade systems can pack 672 CPUs into a standard 7-foot rack, requiring 38,400 watts of power and generating more heat than a commercial-grade oven.
Additionally, due to the rapid development of server technology and the lack of unified blade standards among different manufacturers, blades from different brands are often incompatible, creating pressure for subsequent purchases. Therefore, when choosing a blade system, it is essential to consider the technical sustainability of the system; otherwise, you may end up wasting money.
For more information, visit: http://www.xwkj.com/zuyong.asp