[Case Details] A certain city is located in the western part of China. In the past two years, to develop the local economy, it was planned to hold an international commodity trade fair on October 1st, 2000, and invited numerous domestic and overseas manufacturers to participate. To attract domestic and overseas manufacturers to invest locally and showcase the good investment environment of the city, besides striving for lenient investment policies and strengthening infrastructure construction, the municipal government also decided to completely update the taxis in the city to establish a good urban image. Therefore, under the leadership of the municipal government, automobile dealers and banks were contacted to mobilize all taxi companies to purchase a batch of Santana sedans through installment payments. This batch of vehicles was officially put into operation during the trade fair.
Due to the approaching date of the commodity trade fair, this batch of vehicles did not have time to go through the procedures issued by the public security traffic management department, such as driving licenses, license plates, and taxi operation certificates. With the consent and coordination of the municipal government, these vehicles were directly put into use without relevant licenses.
After coordination by relevant departments of the municipal government, the taxi company insured the vehicles with vehicle loss insurance, third-party liability insurance, and theft insurance. At the time of insurance, the insurance company was aware that this batch of vehicles had not gone through the procedures for driving licenses and license plates. To ensure the smooth holding of the government-sponsored commodity trade fair, the insurance company undertook to insure this batch of vehicles under the condition that the policyholder promptly completed the relevant procedures. After the trade fair, due to various reasons, the vehicles never completed the relevant procedures. With the approval of the municipal government, these vehicles continued to operate normally, and the traffic management department did not force the taxi company to complete the procedures in time.
In March 2001, one of the insured vehicles was stolen. After the public security department filed the case and investigated for three months without success, the insured party submitted relevant proof from the public security department to claim compensation from the insurance company. Based on Article 5, Item 11 of the current insurance contract: "Unless otherwise agreed in writing in this insurance contract, if the insured vehicle does not have a driving license or license plate issued by the public security traffic management department at the time of the insurance accident, or has not been inspected as required or failed the inspection," the insurance company believed that it was not responsible for compensation. The insured party had doubts about this determination.
[Analysis]
After careful analysis and research, the insurance company believed: Although the insurance contract did not specifically agree that "if the insured vehicle does not have a driving license or license plate issued by the public security traffic management department at the time of the insurance accident," the insurance company would still be responsible for compensation, according to the specific underwriting situation of the insurance business, this insurance accident should still fall within the scope of insurance compensation responsibility. The specific reasons are as follows:
Firstly, the use of this batch of vehicles without driving licenses, license plates, and taxi operation certificates was approved by relevant government departments, and the public security traffic management department also agreed to allow this batch of vehicles to be used without going through the relevant certification procedures. Under the recognition of administrative departments, it should be considered that this batch of vehicles met the conditions for use. In this situation, this batch of vehicles should also belong to the insurable objects that meet the insurance conditions, and the insurance contract signed between the policyholder and the insurance company should be valid.
Secondly, the taxi company as the policyholder did not intend not to handle the relevant certificates but rather because of various reasons, relevant government departments did not issue certificates for the policyholders. Moreover, at the time of signing the insurance contract, the policyholder did not intentionally conceal from the insurance company the fact that these vehicles did not have relevant certificates. From the perspective of the principle of utmost good faith in insurance theory, the policyholder has fulfilled its obligations. In terms of not handling the relevant certificates in time, the policyholder has no fault.
Thirdly, most importantly, the insurer was aware that this batch of insured vehicles did not have driving licenses, license plates, and taxi operation certificates. From the perspective of the waiver and estoppel principles in insurance theory, the insurance company was already aware of this situation when it undertook the insurance, yet it still insured this batch of vehicles and did not raise any objections. It should be considered that this situation has been recognized.
After careful study and analysis, the insurance company believed that although the accident seemed to violate the exemption clause of the insurance contract, it actually conformed to several important principles of insurance theory and should fall within the scope of insurance compensation responsibility undertaken by the insurance company. Ultimately, the insurance company paid the compensation amount for the stolen vehicle to the insured party.
[Insights]
From this vehicle insurance compensation case, it can be seen that when an insurance accident occurs, if the insured vehicle does not have a driving license or license plate issued by the public security traffic management department, whether the insurance company needs to bear the compensation responsibility cannot be generalized. It cannot simply be determined that the insured party violated the agreement of the insurance contract's exemption clause, thereby refusing compensation; it is necessary to specifically analyze the reasons why the insured party meets the conditions of the insurance contract's exemption clause and whether the insurance company was previously aware of the specific circumstances under which the insured party met the exemption clause. Only on this basis can the insurance company make the correct claims handling decision.
Reference Materials:
Related thematic articles:
Location.href='/4983/article_4982028.html" target="_blank">If no employment contract is signed, enterprises pay double wages - Traffic Accident Liability Determination, Prostitution and Gambling may lead to re-education through labor, False Advertising Case. "Because of focus, so simple; because of professionalism, worthy of trust; because of dedication, worthy of entrustment; because of integrity, worthy of reliance." Attorney Zheng initially aimed to become an expert in traffic accident cases and has accumulated many years of experience in handling traffic accidents, possessing rich mediation and litigation skills. He is well-versed in the procedures and processes of handling traffic accidents and has established good relations with courts, traffic police detachments, and disability assessment departments.
Hangzhou Lawyer Consultation Hotline: 15372098360; Hangzhou Traffic Accident Lawyer Network: http://www.51zjls.com