A few days ago, I tried using CVS for version control. It felt pretty average. Last night, I also experimented with RCS, but didn't have many impressions, possibly because my skills are still shallow. But deep down, I feel that version control is only effective when integrated with Code::Blocks, so I'll try installing a plugin for CB in a few days.
Ultimately, CVS is just a passing phase. As a senior student said, "It's the 21st century; if you're not using Git, you should at least be using SVN," haha.
- CVS cannot replace management.
- CVS cannot substitute communication among developers.
- CVS lacks change control.
- CVS is not an automated testing program.
- CVS does not have built-in processing models.
I randomly selected a project to store the original files in CVS. The screenshot is as follows: