This situation in domestic colleges might evolve into a different scenario. The words of this chairman are quite revealing. He labeled the opposition with a big hat of "splitting the student union," claiming that "the Chinese people pursue peace and friendship, we are all students, and should not engage in political struggles." This is precisely what many student union officials excel at. And if their thoughts receive support from teachers, then even if other students have objections, they can still be "smoothed over." The "bureaucratization" issue of student unions in domestic universities has recently been heavily criticized. One important reason is that the student union appears to be autonomous, with elections that look formal, but in reality, who becomes the chairman has already been predetermined by the higher-level organizations of the student union - the Youth League Committee and the Student Affairs Office. This deviates from the nature of student autonomy, turning the student union into an appendage of the school's administrative body, and subsequently becoming extremely utilitarian. The "Student Union" was deregistered by the school authorities due to violations of procedures in the election of its chairman. Many netizens believe that Chinese students still have a long way to go to learn about elections. Some even joked that these overseas students have also learned the power struggle within domestic university student unions. However, this incident actually tells us more than just that; it shows that student autonomy is the best way to solve "power struggles" and make the student union a service organization for students. Although reports say that Cambridge University intervened in handling these electoral disputes, which is very rare in Cambridge University that consistently advocates for club autonomy. But it is worth noting that the intervention of the school authorities was actually very limited, always respecting the principle of student autonomy, hoping that the Student Union could resolve issues internally. According to reports, the approach taken by the school was that if the Student Union could reach an agreement internally and submit a new constitution that complies with regulations before October 1st, the Student Union would not be deregistered by the school. However, the Student Union ultimately missed this opportunity and was finally deregistered. Even after deregistration, if students spontaneously apply for registration again, as long as they comply with the school's club rules, they can reorganize and carry out activities. Analysis of the entire incident shows that it was precisely student autonomy that prevented the irregular actions of the student union chairman from succeeding. For example, some members of the Student Union complained to the school authorities that three months ago, the chairman declared his own re-election without a general election, making this action invalid. They demanded that according to the regulations of the Student Union's charter, an election committee should be organized, candidates should be solicited, and a new election should be held. In domestic colleges, this situation might evolve into a different outcome. The words of this chairman are quite revealing. He labeled the opposition with a big hat of "splitting the student union," claiming that "the Chinese people pursue peace and friendship, we are all students, and should not engage in political struggles." This is exactly what many student union officials are good at, and if their ideas receive support from teachers, then even if other students have objections, they can still be "smoothed over." The "bureaucratization" issue of student unions in domestic universities has recently been heavily criticized. One important reason is that the student union appears to be autonomous, with elections that look formal, but in reality, who becomes the chairman has already been predetermined by the higher-level organizations of the student union - the Youth League Committee and the Student Affairs Office. This deviates from the nature of student autonomy, turning the student union into an appendage of the school's administrative body, and subsequently becoming extremely utilitarian. Therefore, the Cambridge Chinese Student Union controversy not only gave Chinese overseas students a lesson on elections, but also gave mainland Chinese universities a lesson on how to promote student autonomy. Only by respecting students' opinions and having student union organizations produced through democratic student elections can truly represent students. In fact, within the framework of modern university systems, student autonomy, independent operation, academic autonomy, and professor governance are parallel important characteristics. Our country's universities should follow the independent nature of student unions, allowing them to grow healthily in universities and play positive roles in safeguarding students' rights and participating in school operations. In secondary schools and primary schools, encouraging students to establish their own clubs will be the most important way to cultivate students' leadership and team collaboration management skills. It is worth noting that given the "popularity" of student cadres, some secondary schools and primary schools have more than 70% of students serving as various cadres. Schools consider this an innovation in cadre cultivation, but in fact, this so-called "innovation" is still based on the idea that being a cadre is an honor, power, and interest. Under such innovation, more young bureaucrats may emerge, yet they do not know how to serve others or how to influence others. The national "Education Planning Outline" issued by our country in July 2010 proposed to innovate talent cultivation models and reform mechanisms for cultivating innovative talents. In my opinion, reforming the student union cadre system in primary, secondary, and tertiary education institutions, promoting student autonomy in universities, and encouraging students to create various clubs in secondary and primary schools, are worth trying explorations.