Related topic articles:
NO.1 "Skyhook" Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
The 2012 Snow Sports Trade Show will be held in advance.
HD - UEFA Champions League, Barcelona vs Arsenal, Messi scores twice, Van Persie is sent off, Barcelona eliminates Arsenal.
The Chinese people are very concerned about appearances and fundamentally unwilling to admit failure, even when they really fail, they always wait until the next time they have some achievements before summarizing their lessons in a perfunctory manner. However, Chinese football probably has to break this convention because it's really unclear when there will be any achievements worth showing. The last cover-up of the Chinese Football Association has been stripped away multiple times, so they wouldn't care about the withdrawal of Wuhan Guanggu. What is dead remonstration anyway?
Regarding this matter, I think that physical conflicts or even fights among players on the field, or referee errors and missed calls, are all normal and unavoidable events, nothing extraordinary. They should be handled according to the relevant specialized committee's regulations. The key point of this incident is that when Guoan threatened to withdraw from the league, the Chinese Football Association did not immediately impose penalties as per the rules.
I haven't studied the statutes and regulations of the Football Association and the CSL, but based on my experience, I can almost certainly confirm that there must be a clause in the regulations of the Chinese Football Association or the CSL for punishing club officials who make reckless statements (threatening to withdraw from the league). Why didn't the Chinese Football Association immediately penalize Guoan according to the law? What reasons are there for not immediately penalizing Guoan according to the law? Was it unexpected? Was it originally intended to help Guoan? Or was it really out of fear? Here we must emphasize the word 'immediately'. Why could you immediately handle Li Weifeng's case but not handle the Guoan Club's case? After the Wuhan incident is settled, the CBA, the FA might be forced to make a decision to penalize Guoan and then say a set of words like they originally intended to penalize Guoan, but the leaders were absent and needed time to discuss how to penalize.
The essence of the FA's fear of Guoan bullying Guanggu has been confirmed. Saying that penalizing Li Weifeng was not influenced by Guoan's pressure is just something to fool children.
As for the withdrawal of Wuhan Guanggu, that is also an irresponsible act. First of all, I must express my sympathy for the Wuhan Club. The feeling of being bullied and played with is truly unimaginable for those without practical experience. Empathetically thinking, one might even have the motive to kill. But you can't really go and kill someone, you must take deep breaths and control yourself because this isn't just your company or a football project; its social impact is too great, sometimes even beyond what you can bear. Besides, does your resignation through death achieve anything? In the end, you will surely die, but the effect of your remonstration is uncertain, basically speaking, dying would be in vain. Moreover, the timing of Guanggu's withdrawal was wrong, right at the time when the FA hadn't received the news. Apart from making the General Administration of Sport acknowledge the failure of football reform earlier (even if they don't want to admit it), it also increases the difficulty for the General Administration to find a successor for Xie Yalong. The CSL won't change much due to Wuhan's withdrawal; soon there will be new people coming in. As a sports official privately said, "Sponsors are like the endless fools in this world, CBA, one goes, another immediately comes." Except leaving the mark of being the first to withdraw from the league in history, what can Guanggu change? What can it prove? I don't think such a grandiose death will move anyone other than Wuhan. Over time, people from other regions will definitely say, "Unable to maintain the level, no money to play, just using an excuse to step down, how painful."
I still say the same thing: if you're out in the world, you have to endure, even though I'm also someone who can't endure, but not enduring only harms yourself. Chinese culture is exactly this kind of "soy sauce jar culture," gray, ambiguous, with too much room for equivocation. Football is like this, basketball also had the "Fenlun" incident. Therefore, to change the current situation, you must stay within the system, use legal weapons, and also have sufficient patience because the law is also in the "soy sauce jar culture." Isn't it that the law actually believed that Zhou Zhenglong, a farmer, could master advanced computer drawing skills?
Football, oh football, do you deny the failure of reform and return to the national system (which regards you as an exception) or hh