Emancipating the mind means freeing it from a certain mindset. During the Revolutionary War era, our thoughts were freed from the mindset of relying mainly on the armed uprising of the working class and the central city to win the revolution; in 1978, our thoughts were freed from... In 2008, what kind of mindset does emancipating the mind mean freeing it from? Establishing the scientific concept of development means freeing the mindset of local leaders from their one-sided emphasis on government-led, heavy chemical industry’s leading large enterprises and projects driving economic development. We need to see that, on the one hand, this mode of economic development results in short-term rapid GDP growth, making it easy to increase the scale of GDP and boost local revenues; on the other hand, this model leads to high consumption of energy and other resources, ecological destruction, serious pollution, shrinking job opportunities, slow income growth, and difficulties in developing the tertiary industry and other issues. The Central Committee has put forward the requirements for scientific development in recent years. However, due to the inertia of GDP-oriented thinking, the pursuit of unreasonable fiscal and tax relations between the central and local governments, and the fact that large enterprises and projects can quickly increase local fiscal revenue, we have yet to establish a true performance evaluation index system, examination procedures, and incentive system regarding unemployment, ecology, resource conservation, people's livelihood, and other aspects. This has led to many party and government leaders still being accustomed to the traditional model of development subconsciously, remaining trapped in the mindset of government-led, heavy chemical industry-driven large enterprises and project-driven development. Moreover, some comrades are dependent on and satisfied with this development model, lacking worries and a sense of crisis. If we do not free ourselves from the subconscious mindset of this development model and establish the scientific concept of development, the national economy cannot achieve sound, rapid, and sustainable development. To establish the scientific concept of management, the leadership of the state legislature and the State Council departments must free themselves from the mindset of simply regulating and controlling legislation and various departments of economic and social management. Handling the relationship between deregulation and standardization, first is to stimulate the power of social innovation and entrepreneurial drive, allowing the development of vigor and vitality. Followed by establishing norms and order. Since the late 1990s, we have enacted a lot of legislation, introduced numerous provisions by the Government, and developed several implementing rules and regulations by various government departments, improving the legal system and standardizing the market economic order, which played an important role. However, we need to see that sector-led legislation, due to a number of laws and regulations being unscientific, merely seeks to strengthen powers for convenience in management, making it increasingly difficult for urban and rural masses of people to venture entrepreneurs to invest, with more and more unwarranted checks and harassment during business operations, repeated handling of matters across various departments, heavier and heavier charges and fines for aquaculture farmers, residents of entrepreneurship, vehicle transportation, businesses, etc. The result is that farmers lack enthusiasm for growing grain and raising pigs, capable individuals in urban and rural areas lack entrepreneurial enthusiasm, technical personnel and enterprises lack the motivation to invent, create, and industrialize new technologies, entrepreneurs lack the enthusiasm to invest and operate, farmers find it increasingly difficult to migrate to cities, and the new labor force finds it hard to fully utilize their abilities. The entire society loses creativity and entrepreneurial drive, vigor, and vitality due to excessive legislation and government department documents. Of particular note is that the central administrative departments' thinking should be freed from micro-transaction macro approval horizontal affairs longitudinal management, local affairs vertical management mindset; from legislative and developmental requirements focusing on how to facilitate their own management rather than how to facilitate the masses, how to deregulate and promote economic development mindset. What we need to think about is whether the development specification and focus is on social vitality, no matter how, what is the point? Establishing the public-serving view of power and effective leadership and management means freeing oneself from the mindset that power comes from above, lower-levels exercise power, work is the maximization of power. Although theoretically, from our party and the state, the power of state organs and staff comes from the people, their work is to serve the people, leaders and other state workers are public servants, and the people are the masters. However, in actual work, both government bodies, departments, administrative utilities companies, including civil servants and public officers serving in these capacities, are far from this concept in real economic and social management. Feudal power concepts and practices prevail, let alone awareness of being public servants and masters. That is, they lack the awareness that they are providing services for taxpayers. A. Power does not want to be bound. Party and government departments, officials, and staff in real life are reluctant and do not consciously accept supervision by the masses, failing to form an effective mechanism through institutional arrangements for the people to supervise and restrain the government and hospitals via representatives in the People’s Congress system. B. Department power passes legislation to strengthen and legitimize. Numerous legislations led by departments leave other parties involved in the law with no opportunity to participate in the legislative process, and the legal status and powers of other parties are not respected or recognized; many laws overly emphasize the principle of departmental power, often setting such power in the Rules for the Implementation of laws enacted by the department, and often without discussion, review, and approval by the people’s congresses; competition among departments over management power in their respective laws and regulations results in duplication, overlap, contradiction, and miserable law enforcement. C. Inequality exists between administrative, law enforcement, judicial powers and those of residents, businesses, communities. Government officials do not regard their roles as service providers; market supervision work is not treated as mutually de jure equality; social management is regarded as control. D. Abuse of power by some departments and civil servants is also common. Departments and civil servants freely interpret and implement laws and regulations to help increase their power, such as individual leadership using public security institutions as instruments of power to criticize and expose citizens, freely exercising judicial power, etc. To solve such problems, we must establish a public view of power ideologically, that power comes from the people, and power needs to be bound to form a balanced relationship between powers. From unilateral decisions made by the government and departments regarding money, we need to establish a reasonable and modern concept of interests in actual legislative, administrative, judicial, law enforcement, and other governmental and sectoral income-related work. Although our party has proposed the philosophy and purpose of serving the people and ruling for the people, due to the pursuit of personal material life and enjoyment, under market economy conditions, commercialization and money are closely related to the level of personal material interests and income. Consequently, government departments and administrative institutions, in turn, pursue individual interests, small group interests, and maximize power to seek departmental interests, which generally exist. For example, in the distribution of national income, the government has strong executive powers in distribution; corporate capital has weaker power in living allocation; and residents have the weakest distribution power. In recent years, the rapid growth of national financial budgetary and extrabudgetary income contrasts sharply with the much slower growth rate of urban and rural residents’ income compared to the proportion of national allocation growth, leading to a continuous decline in the proportion of residents in the national income distribution. For instance, government departments and administrative institutions attempt to set up fine projects while shirking the obligation of government and financial administration, law enforcement, and judicial appropriation, resulting in rampant charges and fines in 2007, conservatively estimated at around 1.66 trillion yuan, becoming a heavy burden for entrepreneurs, operators, and residents. For example, the low price of local government expropriation of peasants' land, high-priced sale of land to real estate agents, both the requisition system taking away part of the farmers' benefits, and also through high land prices and government department fees and charges part, depriving the interests of buyers. Local government only in 2007 had land revenue up to 1.2 trillion yuan. For example, currently reducing the burden of entrepreneurship, investment, and operation requires reforming the income and expenditure, surplus reward, and fine-sharing system of the industry and commerce departments, forming administrative, law enforcement, and judiciary provided by finance, some local government nostalgia for these charges and fines benefiting the government and finance, unwilling to bear the cost of reform, making these encouraging entrepreneurship, expanding employment Limin reforms encounter strong resistance from the government, finance, and vested departments. For example, various government departments and administrative institutions set up many approval, license, registration, qualification, supervision, and inspection rent-seeking projects, many civil servants use these rent-seeking settings to seek hidden interests and obtain gray income. Of particular note is that government leaders consider financial growth over residents and business growth, financial overcharges as performance rather than as behavior for the people's profit, not as behavior contrary to the budget law; some financial and other government departments, in the clean-up of fees, are unwilling to give up some unreasonable charge interests, even increasing fees and charges to strengthen these interests. Some leadership is willing to collect money and then distribute it down through the government and departments. As everyone knows, such a process increases administrative costs through fees and fines, the government and departments may retain funds, consuming more resources; allocated and distributed at all levels, money is corrupt, and only about 50% of the money actually reaches the intended projects; government overcharging leads to a heavy burden for entrepreneurship, investment, and operation, suppressing and striking blows to ventures, making employment very difficult; residents rely on the government to form premature welfare, causing rising labor costs and falling competitiveness of the national economy. Therefore, there is a need to change the mindset of government and sectoral interests, establish the concept of governing for the people's profit, establish the concept of reform reducing government and departmental interests to increase the interests of the masses, establish the concept of taxpayer service, establish the concept that government money must be agreed upon and approved by the people, establish the idea that the ratio of government revenue to GDP must be reasonable, establish the concept that the proportion of party and government official expenditures in financial expenditures must be reasonable, and foster the concept that sectoral and civil servant interests are decided by the masses and the People’s Congress, establishing a fair concept of civil servant interests across all party and government departments, establishing the concept of isolation and balance between power and interests, and establishing the concept of openness and oversight of interest.