Pondering the governance level from the consequences of pre-holiday inspections for enterprises:

by teddy8182 on 2012-02-08 10:55:34

Before the arrival of various ethnic holidays (especially the Spring Festival), companies often gather employees and various part-time staff to carry out large-scale safety inspections and analysis reviews, thereby ensuring the safety, orderliness, and normal operation of all company tasks during the holiday period. It can be said that when conducting these activities, the attention given by the leadership is extraordinary, and all levels of personnel and employees are particularly attentive. The depth and intensity of the response to the review are greatly enhanced. Overall, the conduct of these activities indeed has many benefits and plays a very positive role.

So, is the result of the company's pre-holiday inspection being paid attention to? Are deep-level issues discovered from these inspection results? Is there any reflection on the phenomena indicated by these inspection results? In other words, enterprise personnel at all levels can improve their levels through reflecting on the results of pre-holiday inspections.

Summarize and reflect on these pre-holiday inspection results according to two aspects: good practices and ideas, and existing problems.

**Reflection on Good Practices and Ideas:**

- Which good practices and ideas can be widely promoted within the enterprise?

- Which good practices and ideas can be fully implemented across the enterprise?

- Are there similar better practices and ideas that can be further applied?

- How did these good practices and ideas come about?

**Reflection on Existing Problems:**

- Which problems are common phenomena?

- Which problems are general assumptions?

- Which problems occur occasionally?

- Which problems are bound to happen?

- Which problems have existed for a long time?

- Which problems have emerged recently?

- Which problems should have corresponding policies and measures?

- Which problems do not have corresponding policies and measures?

- Which problems need urgent resolution?

- Which problems pose serious safety hazards?

- Which problems occurred last year and reappeared this year?

- What is the attitude of the personnel towards these issues—positive or negative?

- What methods do the personnel use when dealing with these issues?

- Do the personnel temporarily resolve these issues or address them fundamentally?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to insufficient problem-solving ability of the personnel or inadequate implementation?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to insufficient capability of the personnel or communication problems?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to significant bias in decision-making by the personnel or insufficient innovation and learning?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to narrow-mindedness of the personnel or conflicts of emotions?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to adherence to outdated practices by the personnel or inappropriate working methods?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to the personnel being overly lenient or lack of fairness and impartiality in work?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to the personnel lacking guidance for employees or inadequate communication and promotion?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to the personnel lacking foresight or the inability to implement work on-site?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to poor conservation awareness among employees or lack of skills?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to insufficient operational level of employees or lack of responsibility?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to weak legal awareness among employees or lack of similar policies and indulgence causing it?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to unsafe behavior of personnel or unsafe state of objects?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to insufficient incentives for employees or insufficient initiative in work?

- Is the occurrence of these issues due to internal factors of the enterprise or external conditions?

Facing the results of pre-holiday inspections, such multi-directional and multi-level reflections can be carried out. Here are two small examples:

Example 1: During the pre-holiday inspection, it was found that the employees of a certain department were complacent and lacked enthusiasm. At that time, through employee discussions and on-site implementation, it was comprehensively reflected whether this situation was long-term or recent, whether it was a majority phenomenon or an individual case. Through such implementation and reflection, it was found that it was because a certain department's personnel were unfair and biased in implementing reward and punishment policies, or perhaps they did not adequately consider the workload, allowing employees to eat a big meal. At that time, it was necessary to change the working mindset and improve the level through discussions with the personnel of that department.

Example 2: During the pre-holiday inspection, it was found that a key machine had malfunctioned affecting production. After investigation, it was found that the main reason for the malfunction of this machine was that a certain component frequently broke down. At that point, practical situations needed to be combined, comprehensively reflected on whether the quality of the component was substandard when purchased, or whether daily operations were improper, or whether the assembly quality was unsatisfactory. If it was found that the malfunction was caused by improper operation, then it was necessary to strengthen the training and guidance of the operators.

Serial Explanation Source: (Editor: Purchaser Editor)