What is carbon? For example, producing one ton of cement generates one ton of carbon dioxide, and for one ton of carbon dioxide, a tariff of $10 to $70 needs to be paid. Think about how expensive that is? Producing one ton of converter steel generates 1.8 tons of carbon dioxide, while one ton of electric furnace steel produces 0.6 tons of carbon dioxide; these numbers may not be very specific. To give a more concrete example, Madonna's latest world concert tour resulted in the emission of 1635 tons of carbon dioxide. If a carbon tax were levied, 1635 tons multiplied by either $10 or $70 would be charged. Assuming the carbon tax is $30 per ton, then Madonna's concert would have to pay a carbon tax of 1635 tons multiplied by $30, which amounts to $49,050. Zhou Xun, to offset her carbon emissions from flying 149,483 kilometers last year, approximately 19.5 tons, spent 6000 yuan to buy 238 trees to compensate for this carbon emission. The Badaling area in Beijing might later be called a "carbon sink forest farm." Spending 1000 yuan on a carbon sink forest can offset your emission of 5.6 tons of carbon dioxide, which is the total amount of carbon dioxide emitted by a Chinese household over two years. How much does each ton cost? Readers, think about your future; even the carbon dioxide emitted from breathing will be taxed. In fact, this market has already been established.
However, why isn't the U.S. interested? It's not that they're not interested, but currently it's not opportune for them, so let other countries wrestle with it first. Let's take a look at the U.S.'s global strategy.
The cluster version, single-machine version, PC version (Chinese and English versions available), Bluetooth advertising machines are available for selection.
Contact information: QQ: 782427569 020-34356228 13763364273 Mr. Zhong 13802406429 Mr. Wu [email protected]
For more information, please visit our website: www.qingchuyulan.com http://qingchuyulanad.cn.alibaba.com
Why isn't the U.S. enthusiastic about Copenhagen? Why is the carbon tax scheduled to be imposed in 2020? Behind these questions lie profound strategies.
The U.S. previously proposed to impose a carbon tax, which Germany, Japan, and China all opposed. However, the U.S. is a very powerful country. They said it doesn't matter whether you support it or oppose it; they'll do it anyway. Therefore, on June 26, the House of Representatives passed a bill authorizing the U.S. government to impose a carbon tax on products exported to the U.S., charging $10 to $70 per ton of carbon dioxide.
The Environmental Protection Act signed in 1998, the Kyoto Protocol, was ignored by the U.S. until President Obama picked it up again. He began devising plans under the banner of an environmental protection strategy led by the U.S. His real intention is to bring large amounts of dollars back to the U.S., while simultaneously striking against the BRIC countries and strengthening U.S. control. As I predicted, on June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill called the "American Clean Energy and Security Act," which authorized the U.S. government to levy a carbon tax, meaning that the U.S. could freely collect carbon taxes on products exported to the U.S.
The Copenhagen Climate Conference has finally concluded. Why didn't we see the 194 countries, 110 heads of state come together like a group of Earth brothers to achieve the results we hoped for? Instead, we ended up with a consensus that lacks emission reduction targets, financial targets, and technological targets, essentially a meaningless agreement. Seeing this result, do you think it's accidental? If you think so, it only shows how naive and innocent you are. Such a conference, where the U.S. didn't invest any effort, how could other countries manage?
Now, we have to pay money to the U.S. just to apply for a domain name, and in the future, concerts will be the same. In the future, Zhou Xun and Jay Chou will have to pay money to the U.S. for their concerts. Why? Carbon reduction. As long as the fee collection center is set in the U.S., the U.S. can charge various fees, just like developing the internet, including charging for TV programs. This is the ambition and intent behind the U.S.'s new energy policy.
As of July 2009, sales of existing homes in the U.S. have increased for four consecutive months, with the largest increase in July in ten years. On August 21, the New York Stock Exchange surged strongly, setting new highs for 2009 for all three major indices. Commodity prices also rose, with international crude oil futures on the New York market once breaking through $74 per barrel. As the epicenter of the global financial tsunami, the U.S. economy obviously needs a powerful means of self-rescue after hitting bottom. So, has the U.S. found such a means? Has the U.S. government already begun, under the careful planning of its strategists, a new round of global order reconfiguration?
Related thematic articles:
Bluetooth Advertising Machines Can Be Used This Way
The Seven Cards Everyone Must Keep
Five Numbers Closely Related to Daily Life