After the Wu Gang incident, I recalled an excellent commentary in the "Nan Du". The title "There will always be a way to deal with you" made me think that if the "you" referred to bad people, then there would be no fraudulent black intermediaries, and Wu Gang would not have had to kill, and such tragedies would not have occurred. Unfortunately, this method has been misused. What are these methods? Where are they used? Let's take a look first.
If one person is arrested and the characterization of the mafia is wrong, then check for intentional injury. If there is no intentional injury, then check for gambling, involvement in pornography, provoking trouble, bribery, drug trafficking, and illegal business operations. You cannot be as pure as a holy infant. I must arrest you correctly.
If an official has already been detained, without accepting bribes, check for embezzlement, without embezzlement check for disciplinary violations, without disciplinary violations check for women affairs. He must not enter and leave clean.
To deal with a company, if there is no tax evasion, check for illegal business operations, if there is no illegal business operation, check its registered capital, if there is no false registration, check whether there is land resale. In today's China, there are hundreds of charges that can be used against companies.
If a case is mishandled, the court absolutely cannot directly acquit and release. This would lead to state compensation responsibilities and make it troublesome for those on public salaries. Therefore, they must work together to handle the defendant. Other issues can be investigated further; if one thing is wrong, others must be right. Investigations can be extended indefinitely, courts can impose sentences but exempt from punishment, prosecutors can decide not to prosecute for minor offenses, withdraw charges and re-prosecute slowly, withdraw and investigate again, police can grant bail but not transfer for prosecution. If you cooperate, all is well; if not, we'll arrest you again. Write a guarantee letter to conclude the matter. If you keep quiet, so will I. Otherwise, it's endless.
In a demolition event, check who is the mastermind behind the scenes, who is the leader, then check for tax evasion, crimes, public security incidents. If there are no problems, bribe, alienate, divide and conquer. Give someone ten thousand yuan instead of two, and help us. Then I tell others that you have betrayed them, causing internal conflicts and arguments, making me at ease. If you still don't listen, check for inciting disturbances, illegal fundraising, embezzling litigation fees, violating petitioning regulations and detain you. If lawyers dare to challenge, complain to the judicial bureau and suspend your license, or don't cause so much trouble, just like dealing with Beijing lawyer Zhu Jiuhu, arrest him first for inciting disturbances and fraudulently collecting legal fees. Under the name of "stability overrides everything" and "harmonious justice", such "leveling is skill" shows of "public power crooked mouth performances" occur daily across China.
Public power, which should maintain basic fairness and justice in society, day by day performs such "crooked scriptures" that only "crooked monks" can chant. "There will always be a way to deal with you" is the root cause of the loss of credibility of public power. Public power needs morality. Establishing credibility for public power does not solely rely on the coercive force of the state machinery, not on having police, courts, armies, and prisons, but on making people truly believe that public power is fair, humane, for the legitimate interests of every individual, strictly abiding by laws rather than malicious enforcement, and based on public values of fairness and justice. If public power also behaves like petty hooligans or mountain kings, using any means necessary to achieve their goals, then the common people will also use more cunning methods to counteract public power...
The above is part of the article. If they could use these skills in the right place, would there be fewer tragedies? In China, it is like this: trivial matters involving ordinary citizens are ignored unless there is benefit or advantage, such as petty thefts, fights, and scams, where relevant authorities find it hard to be proactive. But when it comes to profitable activities like anti-pornography and gambling crackdowns, they become very active. Everything must wait until it becomes a big issue before action is taken. If relevant departments had handled the Wu Gang incident earlier, the killing tragedy might not have happened. And some matters are not only managed passively by relevant departments but also collude for profit.
Previously, it was said that if the people don't report, officials won't act. Now, I see that if the people don't create disturbances, officials won't act. Everything must wait until it becomes a major issue or threatens the interests of those in power before they appear, such as mass incidents and intercepting petitions. Their efficiency is guaranteed to be high and fast, with slightest unrest leading to full military and police deployment as if facing a major enemy.
Why isn't this effort for maintaining stability used in resolving conflicts early, safeguarding the interests of the masses, solving problems for the people, and combating all kinds of illegal fraud?
"To whom does 'there will always be a way to deal with you' apply?" If there were a way to deal with the misuse of public power, the supremacy of power over law, and abuse of authority... and if all these tactics were used for the people, I believe there would be fewer tragedies, and the term 'maintaining stability' would fade away!