The child had been at school for only half a month, and it was unexpected that he would be scolded and beaten by a young female teacher, leaving at least seven bruises on his body. Outraged, Ms. Hao, the mother, posted a video online. On the 12th, after our A3 edition reported this matter, the city's Education Bureau staff called several times, expressing their willingness to provide assistance and thoroughly investigate this incident. However, Ms. Hao ultimately feared that it would affect her child, so she rejected the Education Bureau's help and decided to settle privately with the school.
Just half a month into school, the child had at least seven bruises on his body. The mother angrily filmed the bruises all over her six-year-old son's body and posted it online accusing the teacher of the child's school. This video was uploaded online in the afternoon of the 11th. In the tens-of-seconds-long video, the child's bruises were clearly visible. However, the child's face was also very clear. After seeing the video, the reporter contacted the child's mother, Ms. Hao, kindly reminding her that she should blur the child's face.
On the morning of the 12th, when the reporter opened the website again, the post was still there, the content was still there, but the video was gone.
The Education Bureau wants to thoroughly investigate this matter.
At around 10 o'clock in the morning on the 12th, the staff from the Publicity Department of the Education Bureau called the reporter: "After seeing your report, we paid great attention. Which school is mentioned in the report? We want to ask about the situation."
Subsequently, the reporter called Ms. Hao. Ms. Hao said: "I don't want to make this matter too big, let me discuss with my family."
Afterwards, the Education Bureau staff called three times, expressing their hope to investigate this matter.
With Ms. Hao's consent, on the afternoon of the 12th, the reporter gave her phone number to the education department.
Unexpectedly, Ms. Hao rejected their help. The Education Bureau staff helplessly said: "This matter can't be resolved now. We have already expressed our willingness to provide help, but she doesn't reveal any information to us, not even the district where the school is located. She said that she would settle this matter privately with the school."
Worried about the child, the parents want to settle privately.
Because of the fear that the child might be treated unfairly at school, until now Ms. Hao has not disclosed the names of the school and the teacher.
On the 12th, the reporter communicated four times with Ms. Hao. After several discussions with her family, she still insisted: "We all think that we don't want to make this matter too big, fearing it will affect the child."
At 2 PM, the reporter contacted Ms. Hao again by phone. She said: "Just now, the principal of the school called and said that the child's teacher has been suspended for investigation, and he will give us a good resolution, so let's leave it at that for now."
"What about the child? Did he go to school today?"
The person on the other end of the phone hesitated: "I haven't asked yet. His father said it seems like he went to school, I'll ask again later."
â—ŽNetizen Opinions
Communicate well with the teacher
On the 12th, replies to this post kept appearing. While paying attention to the event, some netizens were angry, while others were puzzled. If it's true, why not directly expose the school? Everyone has their own opinion.
Netizen "Cute Gray Wolf": "Don't just listen to the child's one-sided words. Take a recorder and go to the school to have a good talk with the teacher."
Netizen "Lan De's Flower": "Directly confront the teacher who hit the child. An eye for an eye. No matter how mischievous the child is, there's no need for her to hit him."
Netizen "luguo1": "You shouldn't just listen to the child's one-sided words. There are always causes and consequences to every event. For the child's growth, you should communicate more with the teacher and understand the child's situation at school." Reporter Gongyan