Not childish? If I don't need you, so I... And if I do need you, so I... One already pays, it's not without being childish, he loses himself in his most original state. Suppose it's not based on necessity (for example: because I am lonely, so I need you to accompany and console me), this is not false, but a kind of demand mixed with reality. True love is very easy, it means his needs have not lost their foundation (for example: because of your company and comfort, he no longer feels lonely), then the significance of your existence decreases. Therefore, if someone truly loves you, it's not because they are bored and don't think about it, and when they invite you to look at them, please slow down. If they fall off, they only want you to look up to them! They just need you, this is not for you! And if it's a selfless offering, all needs are actually invitations: He needs someone to achieve something with him, so he extends an invitation to you. And the test is also very simple, when you gently refuse his invitation or even hesitate, he immediately respects your opinion and takes the next step, instead of relentlessly pursuing you until you agree. Why is it new? Just because he doesn't have a fragile personality that needs you to support, but out of respect for his personality, he invites you to share the beautiful moments of his life. So our first requirement is freedom, may the birds happily fly freely in the sky, may we be happy with each other!
One aspect refers to giving based on free will, which is a clear demonstration. Another aspect refers to fully respecting individual freedom, without attaching any desire, hope, request, or even coercion in the act of giving. False love is a sweet pleasure, not mutual exploitation. But many people's relationships start with public happiness and end with heavy burdens. People can't help but use constraints to ensure their own security, not knowing that it only leads to fewer understandings.
And how can a completely free person lose anything? It's naturally reasonable, but when it comes to practice, it's not easy to do! No one asks: 'What makes you angry at a person?' You can only say what doesn't make you angry at a person, and there's nothing that makes you angry at a person. Being angry at a person is a feeling. Not being angry at a person is a fact. Facts are easily resolved, feelings are like rivers. Love isn't suddenly for no reason, we miss someone as if we've lost something new, we want to get close to him, my heart undergoes sudden changes, wanting to hug him. Afterward, whether dull or sad, I still don't want to start anything with him again. Only when I don't see a person, can I find the reasons, because I initially criticized. No matter who, if you criticize, you will definitely find flaws. The more you criticize, the fewer merits remain, and I might even find reasons not to be angry with him. I want a piece of clothing, even if it has big flaws, I would still accept it after complaining a bit, because there's only one, and I'm too attached to it, flaws don't overshadow merits! If I basically don't want this piece of clothing, its big flaws are fatal. I rather try hard to find other merits, such as fabric not being stiff enough, color being too dark, seller not being trustworthy, I wouldn't even consider it, I wouldn't waste time thinking about it! There could be many reasons for separation, but divorce has only one reason, and the reason is: no reason needed!
More wonderful themes: Without complaint, Why does God give women the nature of a sixth sense, Forget your goodness, Let Tengzhong and Hummer "freely fall in love", We forget everything. These two days' real feelings inside, it's one word, tired. Really tired. Entrusting everything to me, I can't handle it well. Very tired, I think I really need to rest. Don't torture yourself!