Nine parts of a series of essays written to you, and finally to the last one, the matter about to declare the end, I almost sigh. Why is it that I often sigh as if taking a deep breath? In fact, the action is the same: suck in a long breath and then spit it out. It's just a slightly different state of mind, nothing more. Originally, even a series of things to finish should be so. But often, only friends tell me that my current age and experience are not suitable for writing such things. For such advice, I thought about it then. But I know that it’s not only about age and experience; more importantly, I don’t have such a heart. Though I also have some worship for Buddha, it's more for his personality, his genius thinking that the pursuit of the ideal never slackens, even to the body to show the spirit of the law. Many things in Buddhism, it is not because the former has a clear purpose that I write these things. I even know the method I want to see the Buddha’s system of thought, reflect on it. So, here I want to make a summary conclusion, but not to the Buddha, but to summarize a few things for myself, to see what I have gained from the Buddha’s system, and what I can say about it, or even other viewers?
But first, I need to declare a principle: I am not saying the mystery of things. I actually do not like that nirvana of the Buddha’s ideal environment, because of the reason I said earlier, the so-called ideal, but because of dissatisfaction with the status quo, made out of an escape. Though the escape road, but is necessary, useful life. When the mind sees such an escape road, at least you can prove that life is one of discontent, at least can prove it has a go in the direction, at least to prove that this spirit can also be better normalized by. However, this is an escape but also a road, a real life way to go. Because we always have to find some meaning of the escape road, and find out the real life some meaning, otherwise, we need the escape road to do? Buddha’s Nirvana is too...but too what cannot help but flow in the misty, people see are not clear, foggy, and the end can only sigh a few times.
Furthermore, because the survival of much pain and escape to survive, has always been afraid to face or can't face up to this survival, but also that bitter subdued. This seems the idea of our security living in a venue, this venue on behalf of students, there have been a big wicked, O wicked man, created a lot of pain, you fear him, hate him, you always want to flee. In fact, the way to flee, there are two: make him disappear, or go away by yourselves. I would like that, Buddha chose the latter. Buddha why choose the latter, instead of like most people, efforts to make the opponent leave it? I thought, this is the Buddha specific Help if alone from the ideological system architecture point of view, the Buddha system is almost can be regarded as satisfactory. Summed up well, said over and over. The five desires, five aggregates, apart from these all sorts of argument outside, as well as verify that the followers to say whether the Dhamma The In fact, a single look at this, it is also enough. Because this is the most basic of the Buddha’s system of thought is most simply clear framework. This contains the Buddha’s view of the world, as well as the methodology derived by the worldview, of course, the ideal of the Buddha must be inside. So-called It is said that only the Buddha to open show it, the rest only with the Buddha and explanations, and even great such as pratyekabuddhas who only own consciousness, there is no way to the Four Noble Truths to the degree of sentient beings. The purpose of interpretation of the Four Noble Truths of Buddha, to tell us that the causal world and the world cause and effect. Plate road - because of the worldly. Such a view, the clarity of the Buddha’s system of thought. This in turn makes me have to Expressed the highest respect, I again summarize my words about Buddha’s world outlook and methodology: this world We see, ah, we take a look, this is not a standard system of philosophy what is it? It contains that world, as well as we can see whether Do some of the philosophers, probably only pay attention to the world , at least, there is no ideal environment as a separate Reference to the Buddha’s system of thought, I get, I know some of the basic architecture of a system are the only under this framework in order to make people an see you world outlook and methodology, as well as ideal. I have been a wrong, that is very kind of liked For this, I would like to have the necessary detailed explanation: the so-called Again, the so-called ideal, but because of dissatisfaction with the status quo, heart, out of the escape road. Why Council is not satisfied? Of course, because this world in the I call it the In fact, from this perspective, the architecture of Marxism is somewhat similar, it is these speak, of course, is the definition given by Marxist scholars would help if I have to cling to what I can understand: political economy, with the willing So, in order to better build my system of thought, my next step might be to start seriously contemplation theoretical system of Marxism, but perhaps I will go to see the sort of Christianity, and Islam, the reason for a with Buddhism as religion, and one I would also like the However, in practice what happens, I am not sure things in the future, Who knows for sure? Lu Xun said: The courage to face it is possible to deal with the right to change, correct and courageous. Buddha eventually chose to leave, not because he is not a His view of the world, this should strike the limitations of the era. In his time, Therefore, the ultimate view of the world goes wrong, the next is almost Thus, a correct understanding of the world is very important. Buddha but finally is great, because the end of their life in pursuit of their own, even when all of the ideal. Guess