In conclusion, taking into account the relevant facts mentioned in the trial transcript and defense statement of this case, all the facts fall within the scope of adjustment of Articles 20 and 21 of the Criminal Law. In the absence of other indisputable evidence provided by the public prosecutor to rebut that the defendant's actions do not conform to "emergency avoidance" or that there are specific legal provisions stating that Article 20 and Article 21 of the Criminal Law cannot be applied, the judge can at least apply Article 21.2 according to the defense's argument, determining that the defendant exceeded the limits of emergency avoidance and should bear criminal responsibility, but the punishment should be mitigated or exempted. Therefore, up to now, based on the above analysis, Cui Yingjie should not be sentenced to death according to law.