I went to listen to the trial, one because the owner of the case is my friend; secondly, the current treatment of mental illness patients is an extremely dark scene. Its darkness far exceeds the doctor-patient conflict in general hospitals: if the problem in general hospitals mainly lies in "medical marketization", monopoly of national hospitals and industry management nonsense, then mental hospitals have some other problems. Under the existing system of psychiatric treatment, a citizen can be regarded as someone without capacity for action, and be sent into an insane asylum by relatives and government/officials without going through strict legal procedures and medical identification procedures. Moreover, once you get in, it's hard to get out, the more you say you're not sick, the more you seem like a mental patient. The owner of this case was sent there by his/her family. One of the focuses of both parties in court is, on what grounds did the hospital confine an adult without going through legal and medical identification procedures, and even use violence and instruments such as handcuffs?